Skip to content
Payments guide

Who owns Dojo? Paymentsense and the registered company

“Dojo”, “Paymentsense” and a holding-company name can all appear in the same research. Distinguishing a trading name, the contracting company and filed control information avoids confusion.

Sources checked

Commercial disclosure: Time Consulting is an independent Dojo introducer and consultant, not Dojo and not a whole-market broker. We may receive an introducer fee if you take a product through us. Our commercial relationship should be considered when reading this guide.

In brief

Dojo’s UK website terms identify Dojo as a trading name of Paymentsense Limited, company number 06730690. Companies House lists Hurricane Bidco Limited as the active corporate person with significant control of Paymentsense Limited. That is not a complete statement of every ultimate investor.

Who operates the Dojo brand?

The official website terms name Paymentsense Limited as the company behind Dojo. The Companies House company record identifies it as an active private limited company incorporated on 22 October 2008.

A trading name is not a separate company just because it has its own logo and website. When reading an offer, check the legal entity in the application documents rather than relying only on the brand at the top of the page.

What does the ownership record show?

At our check, the Paymentsense control register listed Hurricane Bidco Limited, company number 10466857, as its active corporate person with significant control, with at least 75% of shares and voting rights and the right to appoint or remove directors.

This is filed control information for that company. It is not a complete map of the group’s ultimate beneficial ownership or every investor’s economic interest. We have not reconstructed the full holding-company chain. Companies House also cautions that it does not check the accuracy of filed information.

Directors, founders, investors and controlling shareholders are different roles. A director’s name alone does not establish ownership, and a historic funding announcement does not establish the current ownership percentages.

What matters for a merchant?

  • Your counterparty: confirm which legal entity supplies each service and appears on the contract and invoices.
  • Your account: an old Paymentsense agreement and a new Dojo offer should not be assumed to have identical rates, hardware or terms.
  • Additional products: funding or another service may involve a separate provider and agreement.
  • Your support route: check the official contact details rather than assuming an introducer is the provider’s account-support team.

Legal-company status does not guarantee future service quality, suitability or financial strength. Use product demonstrations, contractual checks and current official records for their distinct purposes.

Where does Time Consulting fit?

Time Consulting is an independent Dojo introducer and consultant. We are not Dojo, Paymentsense Limited or their customer-support department. We may receive an introducer fee where a business takes a product through us, and we do not act as a whole-market broker.

For commercial due diligence, continue with fees and contracts. For a balanced product discussion, read our evidence-based Dojo assessment. The funding eligibility guide explains why the specific funding provider also matters.

Sources and method

Author: Time Consulting editorial team. Checked: .

We checked Dojo’s own legal identification and the public Companies House company and control records. We report the registered operator and the filed direct control entry, not a full ultimate-ownership investigation, valuation or assessment of solvency. Filing information and ownership can change.

We may receive an introducer fee. Provider approval, pricing and contractual decisions remain with the relevant provider. Ask about a source, correction or our commercial relationship.

Know who you are dealing with

Ask us about our introducer role or discuss the Dojo documents relevant to a new enquiry.

Ask a Dojo introduction question